Road Test Kawasaki W800 How To Save Money And Do It Yourself!

25 Май 2015 | Author: | Комментарии к записи Road Test Kawasaki W800 How To Save Money And Do It Yourself! отключены
Kawasaki W800

Did this video help

TRUFFLEHOUNDEXPRESS: @RocknLester2011 So it’s not copy bike (duplicate) of machine. Glad you agree and we got straight.

saroun11: true

latania2005: Nice try, but the ‘W’ range was first in the sixties, and yes it took it’s cues/engine configuration from and even american bikes had gone before. The first were produced in the fifties, and it was own design!

latania2005: LOL, Kawawsaki for inventing a sixties bike with a parallel

otto black: love the would love one, thing not to like, is the lack of the of the classic 650s and 750s, to u tube bsa thunderbolt, u will what I mean, they as frantic as a 4 cylinder. would be perfect otherwise.

RocknLester2011: you what you want. whatever yer boat they say.

Francesco Ulivieri: A true of bikes! Great!

sdipper7: too wind noise. Need to the engine.

RocknLester2011: Thanks its almost impossible to write on here!

RocknLester2011: @TRUFFLEHOUNDEXPRESS look at the classic Brit for ex BSA, Triumph,Norton etc little bit of not saying its a bad copy,just stating an all,nothing more to read

RaptorGP: Mmmm, such a bike!

TRUFFLEHOUNDEXPRESS: @RocknLester2011 as a matter of interest — a of what? The old W650 was produced the Hinckley Bonneville. Styling from the 60s in a modern machine modern technology does not to a copy, Or does 2 cylinders and 2 make it a copy?

Gull03: . video.

latania2005: Triumph were ‘modern’ Bonnevilles in the eighties electric starter and ignition, is distinctly different from the But what one calls ‘modern’ is Plus, as I said earlier the is based on their early range of bikes which a blatant COPY of the bonneville, in styling and being parallel

You Sir, are a fraud of the highest LOL

dodgydave9118: Care the less if it IS a I love it! Old Brit bike with fiercely reliable technology (apart from drum brake on the back. What’s not to like?

RocknLester2011: copy bike from the

Michael Campbell: Oh yeah bike too!

TRUFFLEHOUNDEXPRESS: Firstly you are incorrect regarding the W They were based on the BSA A7 / Secondly you don’t understand COPY means in the sense of I have explained below technical differences that the word copy in the sense of inappropriate re. the W650.

The point I’m labouring to is that the W650 was unique in of combining 1960’s styling with, for example, an engine that makes it technically thus not a copy.

wannatroll: brake. less maintenance. not effective, but this bike about performance.

latania2005: OK

@dodgydave9118 I like this it’s a real fun to drive, and good chassis and engine. Brake it’s nostalgic and power. try this

Ali Yorgancioglu: bike. What brand are gloves in this video?

Kawasaki W800

Michael Campbell: dont that meathead the breath it to explain what you meant. these days wants an for any comment someone says. Its japper copy, plain and

Let him waste his time trying to whether you mean something or bad, and if it bothers him that dont read the comments.

LOL, they are not connected. than they are made by the manufacturer, look the same, a parallel twin and start a ‘W’. Please just that your trusty would not exist if it was not for the original which was COPIED by Kawasaki. Who can them though. not me!

Gunther Von Oh that can be sorted with a of open pipes my friend!

Oh and another point. The W650 and are unconnected with the W1, W2 or W3 other by being parallel twins a 360° crankshaft and a model that begins with W.

It’s not a question of a nice I am correct. The superb W650 (I owned a 1999 model new) — was a unique — a modern day revamp of a style machine.

It is NOT a copy of anything. British motorcycles of the period had pushrod the W650 is distinctive in having a bevel-gear overhead camshaft, is no real link between the new and old and the new Triumph FOLLOWED the W650 also own a superb 2012 SE

o0L4nc3r0o: I’m usually a fan of the modern bikes, but I must say both the Kawasaki W800 and the Bonneville are very beautiful, bikes. )

John Mosey: You got right bro. I had a 1973

TRUFFLEHOUNDEXPRESS: Look, try and understand. We all the W650 ( I own one) and the new Bonneville (I own were heavily cosmetically by the original Bonneville. I’m saying that it is a fact the W650 is technically different. If you all parallel twin engines are the — ,read up.

Understand — the W650’s is significantly different from the Bonneville and cannot be described as a in the sense of duplicate.


Test Kawasaki W800 4.7 out of 5


Tagged as:

Other articles of the category "Kawasaki":

Our partners
Follow us
Contact us
Our contacts

Born in the USSR


About this site

For all questions about advertising, please contact listed on the site.

Motorcycles catalog with specifications, pictures, ratings, reviews and discusssions about Motorcycles.