Talk:Suzuki SV1000 — Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

19 Май 2015 | Author: | Комментарии к записи Talk:Suzuki SV1000 — Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia отключены
Suzuki SV 1000

Talk:Suzuki SV1000

POV check [ ]

There are a number of lines offer opinion or unverifiable about the bike in this that need to be rewritten,

The SV1000 and SV1000S are quality for the money.

. it is not uncommon to see a well SV650 or SV1000 pass a bike on the track.

I also the classification of the SV1000 as a sport-tourer is it seems to be solidly in the realm of the or … bike by the styling, position, etc. But I’ll that up to people with motorcycle experience to decide. 20:41, 6 April 2006

Re the first point; test test of this bike has excellent handling, decent and easy to ride power I don’t see many other costing a tad over £6000 all this. For my vote, the quality for the money is a fair comment.

Second point; SV against an R1 or on the track. I don’t think so! a lot of power and weight difference to be away.

Second point: i it may be fairer to say that its corners these bikes take other riders by surprise. It is common in the SV650 relm becuase of the lack of power it has faster and better handling that the rider gets out of their bike and as such to use the bike near its limit as a fast R1/R6 can be a lot for many to handle and mess it all up.

I have my SV650 against TL1000s are the beast and have kept up the corners, ok staights are a no go for me but on corners i am through them. Its a well fact that a couple of the top schools use the SV650 for their while the learners have powerfull bikes to prove power is not everything to riding. TSM 9 June 2006

(ld 15-Jun-06) I think some solid facts/specs rather vague summaries would it more like a useful than a discussion forum or a magazine review. e.g. The and 2006 models got a slight in compression and a few other internal but it mostly remains the same from 2003. The Suzuki and SV650 were originally with some problems their initial introduction, is to be expected with any new vehicle.

with the evolution of the product, of the bugs have been out. Model year or reference to. plauged with problems — plagued many, some suggests problems not stated or referenced. of expectations, and that the non-stated worked out.

If opinions are to be should be as a quote, name,

(mjs 26-jun-06) I have for many years, and find a v-twin really does inline fours in the corners. ridden a v-twin, I wouldn’t go to an inline four either. I’ll grant you that the world isn’t a corner, but it all straight either.

So onto the specs as one writer put it. take all the following facts, and quotes from CycleWorld’s issue — August Page 46 — Horsepower Aprilia RSV (a v-twin) @ 120.82hp, 999s (a v-twin) @ 121.12hp, and the ZX-10 (an inline 4) @ 151.50hhp.

You assume that the Kawasaki win in the Masterbike competition that was at Jerez this year on the incorrect assumption that one made of horsepower being The Aprilia ran 1:52.514 around the the Duke ran 1:53.624, while the ran 1:52.573. Not that much of a huh?

So let’s take the 6 laps CycleWorld did. The ran a 1:54.922, the Duke ran a 1:55.670, and the a 1:53.959. still not a huge yet the Kawai is sporting

31hp more then the and

30hp more then the The important thing here is power doesn’t mean in a racing circuit; it’s how you use power you have, AND how well the chassis and handling performs. for refence, in the Masterbike test, the bike was the MV Agusta (an inline 4 144hp) @ 1:51.172, and 1:54.463 in the 6 lap average. All testers had racing except for three (page

Sorry, couldn’t find and RELIABLE specs on the SV1000 or Superhawk — I’d that they can’t be then 110hp — I don’t count manufacturers as reliable. Dyno tests the same dyno, at approx. the time, temperature, altitude, and onboard computer are what deem as reliable. All dynometers are while 1 may read 150hp may read 151.5, even the same manufacturer.

In closing; If you ever do get a chance to try a on the track (Aprilia, Suzuki, etc), I think you’ll be surprised.

As stated above, is an encyclopedia not a blog, there are inaccuracies in this article in respect:

I would support a cut in this article and a re-write to technical specifications only, and separate articles to discuss big theory (Motorcycles) in relation to and any other information relating to motorcycles or motorcycle geometry See the article Honda VTR1000F for an FzerozeroT 22:41, 14 November (UTC)

problems [ edit ]

the article: The Suzuki SV1000 and were originally plagued some problems after initial introduction. .

What these problems, exactly, and who is them? All bikes (and have some anecdotal of various problems, but that mean the reports are statistically or unusual in any way. —Bk0 ) 20:25, 19 August 2006

External links [ edit ]

The links are in violation of WP:External_links and been removed.

Please relinking these sites on talk page before them to the article. See also:

03:54, 22 January 2007

Interesting articles

Tagged as:

Other articles of the category "Suzuki":

Our partners
Follow us
Contact us
Our contacts

Born in the USSR


About this site

For all questions about advertising, please contact listed on the site.

Motorcycles catalog with specifications, pictures, ratings, reviews and discusssions about Motorcycles.